Search results
1 – 2 of 2Kimberlee D. Snyder, Patrick Paulson and Patrick McGrath
This paper focuses on the process mapping of two medical clinics and the events presently under‐way to design, implement, and maintain an integrated information system with two…
Abstract
Purpose
This paper focuses on the process mapping of two medical clinics and the events presently under‐way to design, implement, and maintain an integrated information system with two other health‐care entities.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper is part of a larger research project which will be a four‐year study documenting the development, implementation, and measurement of an unprecedented effort to launch a comprehensive, community‐based e‐health initiative in a small community with limited resources.
Findings
The medical professionals will find, as they continue to grow with the system and supply the database with pertinent information about each individual patient, that they will truly benefit in unthinkable ways.
Originality/value
This paper documents the events presently under way at two independent clinics.
Details
Keywords
This chapter uncovers the destabilizing and transformative dimensions of a legal process commonly described as assimilation. Lawyers working on behalf of a marginalized group…
Abstract
This chapter uncovers the destabilizing and transformative dimensions of a legal process commonly described as assimilation. Lawyers working on behalf of a marginalized group often argue that the group merits inclusion in dominant institutions, and they do so by casting the group as like the majority. Scholars have criticized claims of this kind for affirming the status quo and muting significant differences of the excluded group. Yet, this chapter shows how these claims may also disrupt the status quo, transform dominant institutions, and convert distinctive features of the excluded group into more widely shared legal norms. This dynamic is observed in the context of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights, and specifically through attention to three phases of LGBT advocacy: (1) claims to parental recognition of unmarried same-sex parents, (2) claims to marriage, and (3) claims regarding the consequences of marriage for same-sex parents. The analysis shows how claims that appeared assimilationist – demanding inclusion in marriage and parenthood by arguing that same-sex couples are similarly situated to their different-sex counterparts – subtly challenged and reshaped legal norms governing parenthood, including marital parenthood. While this chapter focuses on LGBT claims, it uncovers a dynamic that may exist in other settings.
Details